Week #11: Iowa Preview and Open Thread

OSU FootballTomorrow, OSU’s departing seniors will trot onto the field turf for the last time at the Horseshoe. If Cameron Heyward has his way, new Iowa QB James Vandenberg will share that same experience.

I won’t spend too much time on Iowa this week, other than to caution overconfidence on the part of Buckeye players and fans. Unlike the paper tigers from State College last week, Iowa has proven itself to be a good team, certainly the best- or next-best in the Big 10. “Team” being the best descriptor of the Hawkeyes; they’ve been behind in all but one game this year, and come from behind to win in all but one as well. That doesn’t happen to teams that aren’t unified.

Regardless of who starts under center tomorrow, the Hawkeyes will be entering a hostile environment, playing for the outright Big Ten title, and playing for the Rose Bowl berth, which gives them plenty of reasons to come out motivated. There’s a lot of pride on the line for them as well, after being told all week long that their season is over and they have no chance against the Buckeyes. All these factors, along with a QB that had a full week of practice reps for the first time in his college career, means that we shouldn’t be surprised if Iowa pulls off a surprisingly competitive game.

Having said that, though, we shouldn’t give the Hawkeyes too much credit. Iowa peaked early in the season, and had been playing with fire in the weeks prior to their loss. Check out the super-duper-canned-spreadsheet scoring margin chart (dotted lines show the computed trends):

osuIowaTrends2009

According to the trendlines, anyway, it looks like the most competitive game for these two teams would have been in week 2.

Okay, we’ll cut this one short. This week’s questions:

Will Hurt Coleman get his last INT in the Shoe tomorrow?
Total TDs by Pryor?
Will Daryl Clark suddenly appear on the field at 3:47 p.m., having been knocked by Heyward into next week, last week?
Final Score? (Alternate: ROSES!! or No Roses!)

Rivalries_Michigan_Ohio_State

(el Kaiser here, letting you know about this week’s contest) The person with the closest prediction of the final score of the OSU/Iowa game will win a copy of Rivalries: The History of Michigan vs. Ohio State (link opens iTunes) from the iTunes Music Store. (Yes, you’ll actually have to predict a final score, not just ROSES/NO ROSES)

Released in 2004, Rivalries: The History of Michigan vs. Ohio State is a must-view documentary for Ohio State fans. It’s a fairly balanced look at the rivalry through the years. Former players, coaches and journalists all discuss the greatest rivalry in college sports. If you haven’t seen it, you owe it to yourself to watch it. Over and over again.

Please note: this contest is available only to U.S. residents. It is not necessary, but helpful, if you already have an iTunes account, otherwise you’ll have to make one to redeem your prize.

sportsMonkey’s predictions:
Hurt’s INT: Yes, and he’ll return it all the way to the first round of the NFL draft.
Pryor TDs: 3
Clark: Will show up confused, then immediately get sacked again.
Score: ROSES!!

el Kaiser’s predictions:
Hurt’s INT: Coleman is a ballhawk. He gets two INTs as Vandenberg does his best Stanzi impersonation.
Pryor TDs: 2
Clark: Shows up in a ball of energy, naked, and asks Coleman if he’s the legal guardian of John Connor.
Score: OSU: 31 Iowa: 15 (ROSES!)

Iowa, On Paper

Presented without comment:

Statistically Speaking
Ohio State
Value (Rank)
Value (Rank)
Iowa
Advantage
Rushing Offense (ypg) 191.4 (23) 118.7 (37) Rushing Defense (ypg) Push
Passing Offense (ypg) 182.4 (98) 173.0 (16) Passing Defense (ypg) Iowa+
Pass Efficiency 173.0 (56) 94.3 (4) Pass Efficiency Defense Iowa+
Total Offense (ypg) 373.8 (61) 291.7 (14) Total Defense (ypg) Iowa
Scoring Offense (ppg) 30.3 (35) 15.9 (13) Scoring Defense (ppg) Push
Rushing Defense (ypg) 85.4 (3) 119.2 (94) Rushing Offense (ypg) Ohio State++
Passing Defense (ypg) 168.7 (11) 230.6 (47) Passing Offense (ypg) Ohio State
Pass Efficiency Defense 94.9 (6) 123.6 (79) Pass Efficiency Offense Ohio State+
Total Defense (ypg) 254.1 (6) 349.8 (82) Total Offense (ypg) Ohio State++
Scoring Defense (ppg) 11.2 (4) 24.1 (84) Scoring Offense (ppg) Ohio State++
Turnover margin +0.90 (13) +0.50 (35) Turnover margin Push
Penalty Yards/game 43.2 (13) 34.3 (3) Penalty Yards/game Push
Sacks (/game) 2.80 (12) 2.20 (74) Sacks Allowed (/game) Ohio State+
Sacks Allowed (/game) 1.50 (48) 2.00 (54) Sacks (/game) Push
Redzone Offense (%) 75.0 (99) 87.5 (100) Redzone Defense (%) Push
Redzone Defense (%) 81.3 (61) 85.7 (34) Redzone Offense (%) Iowa
3rd Down Conv. (%) 41.4 (50) 36.7 (42) 3rd Down Conv. Def (%) Push
3rd Down Conv. Def (%) 31.5 (12) 41.5 (47) 3rd Down Conv. (%) Ohio State
 Legend
  Difference <25 in National Rank = Push   Difference >25 in National Rank = Ohio State
  Difference >50 in National Rank = Ohio State+
  Difference >75 in National Rank = Ohio State++
  Differences >100 in National Rank = Ohio State+++

Okay, just this comment: Yes, OSU’s defense gives up scores 81 percent of the time in the red zone. They’ve only allowed opposing offenses into the red zone 16 times. That’s less than twice per game.

Source of Terrelle Pryor’s Improvement Discovered

hoyt_shermanArt professor Hoyt Sherman works with Pandel Savic to improve the Buckeye quarterback’s accuracy.

From the Nov/Dec 09 Ohio State Alumni Magazine:

“Sherman conducted classes for the passers and receivers designed to increase their field of vision and sharpen accuracy.

The players would sit in darkness while an abstract figure was flashed on a screen, then copy the figure from memory.

Next they took their improved perception to the practice field. Quarterback Pandel Savic was outfitted with a visor that Sherman would raise for a second to allow Savic identify his receiver, then lower, forcing him to throw blind.

The exercises dramatically improved the Buckeye’s percentage of completed passes during the season.”

An Art Professor working with the football team? What would Woody say about that?

Maybe Siciliano could learn a thing or two.

Stunned Panda is stunned

Stunned

….

Tugg Speedman: No, a panda. I killed a panda
Rick Peck: Amanda?! Come on dude, I mean… tha.. that’s probably not even her real name…
Tugg Speedman: No, a PANDA!
Rick Peck: A panda?
Tugg Speedman: A sweet, cuddly, vicious, little panda

Sweet, cuddly, and vicious

Penn State flushes Rose Bowl hopes

paternoPressFootballSTATE COLLEGE, PA — In his postgame press conference, Penn State coach Joe Paterno had no answers for his team’s odious performance against the Buckeyes.

“We stunk up the place,” said the elder coach, his brown coffee steaming in the chilly November air. “Ya gotta give credit to those guys; they just ripped us a new one.”

The Lions entered the game having laid waste to the chocolate cupcakes that filled the first half of their season. But the Buckeyes lit a match under their ground game and amassed an easy 228 yards against the nation’s #5 ranked rush defense.

pryorScramblePSU09“Those runs, those runs,” complained linebacker Sean Lee, who was manhandled throughout the game by a fired-up Buckeye O-line. “We tried to grunt our way through it, but we couldn’t get any reverse penetration.” He also drew attention to the lackluster passing defense. “We dropped a deuce. Two TDs. We haven’t done that all year. On that third quarter bomb to Posey, I saw it and was immediately yelling ‘Code Brown!! Code Brown!!’ which is our fire drill for the safety to cover the long snake route. We just let that one slip away. We tried to get T.P. all day long, but just ended up with mud all over our hands and faces.”

Paterno agreed. “We laid turds on special teams, too. That number 82, what’s his name, Small, he’s shifty. Had our gunners leaving skid marks in the turf trying to take the angles to catch him. After the first punt return, some of the coaches were over there to the coverage team and trying to get them to let the corn out, you know? Grow a tail, quit with the trots to the line of scrimmage, get out there and tackle. But they let another one happen later. Ah, well. Jimmy’s got a good ball club over there.”

With losses to Iowa and OSU, Penn State can hope to finish no higher than third in the conference. Senior QB Daryl Clark says the team’s focus has changed. “Yeah, we were hoping for the Rose or a national title shot, you know? It’s been a long season, and some of the younger kids are just pooped. But now we seniors just have to lead and get the team to finish out and do our best to get Coach Paterno to the best bowl we can. That’s when he’s at his best – when he’s not too far from a nice bowl.”

JoePaPoopingHimselfAsked if he could make it to a bowl, Paterno said, “Depends. We’ve got a lot of running to do.” And athletic fundamentals aren’t the only focus, as Paterno has plans to bring in a series of motivational speakers to give pregame speeches. “Yeah, we’re gonna try it. I’ve got a rather unorthodox friend – a big bald guy with a cigar – he’ll show up at the bowl at least. We’ll try whatever we can.”

Daryll Clark Sack Face

I’m trying really hard not to be a jerk and rub this in, but indulge me this one time. Then we’ll get to discussing the game tomorrow.

Ohio St Penn St Football

OH WHAT A FEELING

More on this later, obviously, but man did that win do wonders for the soul.

GO BUCKS!

Gameday Open Thread and Live in-game Chat

FootballOSU FootballAnother day of that sweet, beautiful game. Drop any comments, thoughts and gripes in the comments.

After a half of play in the books for the early games, I’m rather interested how Houdini Iowa is getting out of this one. Seriously though, will anyone notice if Stanzi is on the sidelines? Vandberg (Stanzi’s backup) came in and promptly picked up where Stanzi left off, throwing the ball to the wrong team.

Okay, people, it’s time to stop comparing the 2009 Hawkeyes to the 2002 Buckeyes. One of those team had a competent quarterback. And the other team are the Hawkeyes.

The OSU/PSU in-game chat will be after the jump.

[Read more…]

New uniforms revealed early?

11W has a pic of the throwback uniforms announced earlier (and were supposed to be unveiled next week). No confirmation, but looks about right to me.

I am personally excited about these new unis. I love the idea of the throwback, and I love old Buckeye uniforms. I am not, however, impressed with the Athletic Department’s ability to keep these things a secret until the “big reveal.” We’re living in the internet age, people. There are no secrets…

I must break you

clark_thad