<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Men of the Scarlet and Gray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://menofthescarletandgray.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://menofthescarletandgray.com</link>
	<description>An Ohio Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:37:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of College Football: Breaking Up For The Kids by Kade</title>
		<link>http://menofthescarletandgray.com/2012/05/08/the-future-of-college-football-breaking-up-for-the-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-379845</link>
		<dc:creator>Kade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menofthescarletandgray.com/?p=9410#comment-379845</guid>
		<description>To me scheduling down means we get to see games like Oregon vs. Nevada last year (69-20 Oregon).

Most of these games are absolutely terrible and massive blowouts that end up featuring 3rd stringers by the 3rd quarter. It&#039;s worse than watching an NFL preseason game.

Division 1 teams should NEVER play Division 1AA teams….ever. They are on a different level for a reason. With 120 teams at the D1 level….there is no reason another team can&#039;t be found…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me scheduling down means we get to see games like Oregon vs. Nevada last year (69-20 Oregon).</p>
<p>Most of these games are absolutely terrible and massive blowouts that end up featuring 3rd stringers by the 3rd quarter. It&#8217;s worse than watching an NFL preseason game.</p>
<p>Division 1 teams should NEVER play Division 1AA teams….ever. They are on a different level for a reason. With 120 teams at the D1 level….there is no reason another team can&#8217;t be found…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of College Football: Breaking Up For The Kids by Sylvester-Yon Rambo</title>
		<link>http://menofthescarletandgray.com/2012/05/08/the-future-of-college-football-breaking-up-for-the-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-377829</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvester-Yon Rambo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 12:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menofthescarletandgray.com/?p=9410#comment-377829</guid>
		<description>MUST HAZ MOHR FOOTBALL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MUST HAZ MOHR FOOTBALL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of College Football: Breaking Up For The Kids by Jason</title>
		<link>http://menofthescarletandgray.com/2012/05/08/the-future-of-college-football-breaking-up-for-the-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-376533</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 00:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menofthescarletandgray.com/?p=9410#comment-376533</guid>
		<description>Kade - I&#039;m actually okay with continuing to &quot;schedule down&quot; with a catch: OOC schedules must be balanced by some sort of value mechanism, perhaps based on a rolling window (3-5 years should do it) of wins/losses. So scheduling a home-and-home with USC might allow you to also schedule a couple MAC teams in those two years plus a Cincy or Rutgers or whoever. If you want to play Appalachian State, that&#039;s fine but there will be consequences (such as losing to Appalachian State).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kade &#8211; I&#8217;m actually okay with continuing to &#8220;schedule down&#8221; with a catch: OOC schedules must be balanced by some sort of value mechanism, perhaps based on a rolling window (3-5 years should do it) of wins/losses. So scheduling a home-and-home with USC might allow you to also schedule a couple MAC teams in those two years plus a Cincy or Rutgers or whoever. If you want to play Appalachian State, that&#8217;s fine but there will be consequences (such as losing to Appalachian State).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of College Football: Breaking Up For The Kids by Kade</title>
		<link>http://menofthescarletandgray.com/2012/05/08/the-future-of-college-football-breaking-up-for-the-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-376471</link>
		<dc:creator>Kade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 22:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menofthescarletandgray.com/?p=9410#comment-376471</guid>
		<description>Nick,

Who is trying to give a trophy to everyone? Oh wait...the CURRENT postseason system in college football. Right now 70 out of 120 programs make it to bowl games...that means 35 teams win trophies. It&#039;s stupid. Few people care about all of those bowls and the ratings prove that point. They have been trending down for years now.

Frankly if we aren&#039;t going to let the Boise State&#039;s of the world play for a title they should not be allowed to play the traditional powerhouses in BCS AQ conferences. Sure, lets schedule 4 OOC games against a bunch of scrubs and go 4-0 and give the illusion that we are better than we actually are. Typically those 4 OOC games big conference teams play are against the MAC&#039;s and lesser conferences of the world. Instead of playing a better schedule to make games more interesting most teams schedule terrible OOC opponents to bolster their record.

Just look at the SEC....they are the worst offenders.

I&#039;d be fine taking the top conferences in college football and getting rid of everyone else. If you aren&#039;t in a top conference, you don&#039;t get to play for the title...but they are off limits for the regular season as well.

BUT...if they are still allowed to play vs. the OSU&#039;s and Alabama&#039;s of the world they should be allowed to play in a playoff after winning their conference. 

Boise has done pretty well vs. BCS AQ conferences....and look at what TCU did to Wisconsin a couple years ago...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>Who is trying to give a trophy to everyone? Oh wait&#8230;the CURRENT postseason system in college football. Right now 70 out of 120 programs make it to bowl games&#8230;that means 35 teams win trophies. It&#8217;s stupid. Few people care about all of those bowls and the ratings prove that point. They have been trending down for years now.</p>
<p>Frankly if we aren&#8217;t going to let the Boise State&#8217;s of the world play for a title they should not be allowed to play the traditional powerhouses in BCS AQ conferences. Sure, lets schedule 4 OOC games against a bunch of scrubs and go 4-0 and give the illusion that we are better than we actually are. Typically those 4 OOC games big conference teams play are against the MAC&#8217;s and lesser conferences of the world. Instead of playing a better schedule to make games more interesting most teams schedule terrible OOC opponents to bolster their record.</p>
<p>Just look at the SEC&#8230;.they are the worst offenders.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be fine taking the top conferences in college football and getting rid of everyone else. If you aren&#8217;t in a top conference, you don&#8217;t get to play for the title&#8230;but they are off limits for the regular season as well.</p>
<p>BUT&#8230;if they are still allowed to play vs. the OSU&#8217;s and Alabama&#8217;s of the world they should be allowed to play in a playoff after winning their conference. </p>
<p>Boise has done pretty well vs. BCS AQ conferences&#8230;.and look at what TCU did to Wisconsin a couple years ago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of College Football: Breaking Up For The Kids by Sylvester-Yon Rambo</title>
		<link>http://menofthescarletandgray.com/2012/05/08/the-future-of-college-football-breaking-up-for-the-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-373655</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvester-Yon Rambo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menofthescarletandgray.com/?p=9410#comment-373655</guid>
		<description>I think every sports leagues should go to 2 or 4 team only playoffs.

NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, NCAAB, MLS, and every other sporting event.

Lets have less sports instead of most sports should be every sports fans motto!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think every sports leagues should go to 2 or 4 team only playoffs.</p>
<p>NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, NCAAB, MLS, and every other sporting event.</p>
<p>Lets have less sports instead of most sports should be every sports fans motto!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of College Football: Breaking Up For The Kids by Jason</title>
		<link>http://menofthescarletandgray.com/2012/05/08/the-future-of-college-football-breaking-up-for-the-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-373646</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 01:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menofthescarletandgray.com/?p=9410#comment-373646</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll wait &amp; see how they decide to pick the 4-team field before I make up my mind on 4 teams but I really don&#039;t think it&#039;s enough with the current set up. I&#039;m certainly not advocating &quot;handing&quot; Boise anything nor have I heard anyone else say anything of the sort. I am curious which of Stanford &amp; Oregon you think should have been in a 4-team playoff last year and why the other should have excluded -- or if you think LSU, Bama or Ok State should&#039;ve been out instead.

4 teams is better than 2 but more changes are needed to make such a small field work in a fair way. And I&#039;m a big proponent of fairness in sports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll wait &amp; see how they decide to pick the 4-team field before I make up my mind on 4 teams but I really don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s enough with the current set up. I&#8217;m certainly not advocating &#8220;handing&#8221; Boise anything nor have I heard anyone else say anything of the sort. I am curious which of Stanford &amp; Oregon you think should have been in a 4-team playoff last year and why the other should have excluded &#8212; or if you think LSU, Bama or Ok State should&#8217;ve been out instead.</p>
<p>4 teams is better than 2 but more changes are needed to make such a small field work in a fair way. And I&#8217;m a big proponent of fairness in sports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of College Football: Breaking Up For The Kids by Nick salazar</title>
		<link>http://menofthescarletandgray.com/2012/05/08/the-future-of-college-football-breaking-up-for-the-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-373531</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick salazar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menofthescarletandgray.com/?p=9410#comment-373531</guid>
		<description>First off this idea of a 16 or 8 team playoff is such a big joke. 4 team playoff is fair enough. Fact win your games and your in the 4 team playoff picture. This idea of just giving Boise a shot at the championship is also a joke. Weak conference. There field goal kickers choke against Nevada every time they had a chance the last 2 years to
Go to the Title and there Special Teams choked it away 2 times. Win your games and your in. Easy answer. 4 team playoff is just fine. Stop trying to give a trophy to every body. That is the problem in today&#039;s world trying to give a trophy to everyone who come into 5th or last place. If your not good enough you suck plain and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off this idea of a 16 or 8 team playoff is such a big joke. 4 team playoff is fair enough. Fact win your games and your in the 4 team playoff picture. This idea of just giving Boise a shot at the championship is also a joke. Weak conference. There field goal kickers choke against Nevada every time they had a chance the last 2 years to<br />
Go to the Title and there Special Teams choked it away 2 times. Win your games and your in. Easy answer. 4 team playoff is just fine. Stop trying to give a trophy to every body. That is the problem in today&#8217;s world trying to give a trophy to everyone who come into 5th or last place. If your not good enough you suck plain and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BcS by From BCS Controversy to a (Hopefully) Fair College Football Playoff System &#124; Sportige</title>
		<link>http://menofthescarletandgray.com/2010/11/08/5370/comment-page-1/#comment-360528</link>
		<dc:creator>From BCS Controversy to a (Hopefully) Fair College Football Playoff System &#124; Sportige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menofthescarletandgray.com/?p=5370#comment-360528</guid>
		<description>[...] source 1 source 2 source 3   __spr_config = { pid: &#039;4f714a31396cef1920000014&#039;, title: &#039;From Annual BCS Controversy to a (Hopefully) Fair College Football Playoff System&#039;, ckw: &#039;BCS,BCS Bowl Games,Campus Oriented Playoffs,College Football,college football playoffs,Four Teams Plus,National Championship Game,Neutral Sites,Plus One,Postseason Options&#039;, chan: &#039;&#039;, no_slide: &#039;&#039;, slide_logo: false, pub: &#039;2012-04-25 13:41:26&#039;, url: &#039;http%3A%2F%2Fsportige.com%2Fbcs-college-football-four-team-playoffs%2F&#039;, header: &#039;RECOMMENDED FOR YOU&#039; }; var content = document.getElementById(&#039;simplereach-slide-tag&#039;).parentNode, loc; if (content.className){ loc = &#039;.&#039; + content.className; } if (content.id){ loc = &#039;#&#039; + content.id; } __spr_config.loc = loc &#124;&#124; content; (function(){ var s = document.createElement(&#039;script&#039;); s.async = true; s.type = &#039;text/javascript&#039;; s.src = document.location.protocol + &#039;//d8rk54i4mohrb.cloudfront.net/js/slide.js&#039;; __spr_config.css = &#039;http://sportige.com/?srslide_css=1&#039; var tg = document.getElementsByTagName(&#039;head&#039;)[0]; if (!tg) {tg = document.getElementsByTagName(&#039;body&#039;)[0];} if (tg) {tg.appendChild(s);} })(); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] source 1 source 2 source 3   __spr_config = { pid: &#039;4f714a31396cef1920000014&#039;, title: &#039;From Annual BCS Controversy to a (Hopefully) Fair College Football Playoff System&#039;, ckw: &#039;BCS,BCS Bowl Games,Campus Oriented Playoffs,College Football,college football playoffs,Four Teams Plus,National Championship Game,Neutral Sites,Plus One,Postseason Options&#039;, chan: &#039;&#039;, no_slide: &#039;&#039;, slide_logo: false, pub: &#039;2012-04-25 13:41:26&#039;, url: &#039;http%3A%2F%2Fsportige.com%2Fbcs-college-football-four-team-playoffs%2F&#039;, header: &#039;RECOMMENDED FOR YOU&#039; }; var content = document.getElementById(&#039;simplereach-slide-tag&#039;).parentNode, loc; if (content.className){ loc = &#039;.&#039; + content.className; } if (content.id){ loc = &#039;#&#039; + content.id; } __spr_config.loc = loc || content; (function(){ var s = document.createElement(&#039;script&#039;); s.async = true; s.type = &#039;text/javascript&#039;; s.src = document.location.protocol + &#039;//d8rk54i4mohrb.cloudfront.net/js/slide.js&#039;; __spr_config.css = &#039;<a href="http://sportige.com/?srslide_css=1&#038;#039" rel="nofollow">http://sportige.com/?srslide_css=1&#038;#039</a>; var tg = document.getElementsByTagName(&#039;head&#039;)[0]; if (!tg) {tg = document.getElementsByTagName(&#039;body&#039;)[0];} if (tg) {tg.appendChild(s);} })(); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Amedeo Della Valle is a Buckeye by Sylvester-Yon Rambo</title>
		<link>http://menofthescarletandgray.com/2012/04/22/amedeo-della-valle-is-a-buckeye/comment-page-1/#comment-360478</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvester-Yon Rambo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menofthescarletandgray.com/?p=9376#comment-360478</guid>
		<description>I think his low ranking probably comes from being on a extremely high level HS team where he was the 4th option. He didn&#039;t get the attention or accolades of his teammates but I think for what he does he is a perfect fit for Thad Matta&#039;s system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think his low ranking probably comes from being on a extremely high level HS team where he was the 4th option. He didn&#8217;t get the attention or accolades of his teammates but I think for what he does he is a perfect fit for Thad Matta&#8217;s system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Amedeo Della Valle is a Buckeye by freddy</title>
		<link>http://menofthescarletandgray.com/2012/04/22/amedeo-della-valle-is-a-buckeye/comment-page-1/#comment-360013</link>
		<dc:creator>freddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menofthescarletandgray.com/?p=9376#comment-360013</guid>
		<description>Well. Frankly I don&#039;t understand how ADV has been classified as n. 29 of the SGs. He shot 3 pointers this year with a 54%. 
I guess he is a bit underestimated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well. Frankly I don&#8217;t understand how ADV has been classified as n. 29 of the SGs. He shot 3 pointers this year with a 54%.<br />
I guess he is a bit underestimated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

