Archives for November 2006

Week # 10 – Illinois – Open Thread

OSU FootballHi folks! Welcome to this week’s open thread. Sorry we’ve got it up later than usual.

As usual, Buckeye Planet and the O-Zone have great previews of this week’s action.

Illinois is by no means a patsy team this year. Statistically, they’re pretty middle-of-the-pack (Big Ten-wise) in most categories. Last week they played extremely well against a great Wisconsin team, and were only a missed extra point or FG away from another victory or two on the season. Throw in their homefield advantage, and the fact that Illinois always plays OSU hard, and you’ve got the makings for a possible “trap” game for Sweatervest’s crew.

Vegas has the odds at 24 points. Last week, the 2006 Buckeyes tied the 1973 team’s record of winning its first nine games by 17 points or more. If they continue the trend this week, this year’s squad will have the record to themselves, and will probably be considered the best team in OSU history.

This week’s questions:

    Does OSU win by more than 17 points?
    How many rushing yards does Illinois get? O/U: 100
    Pittman starts the game at 894 yards on the season. Does he become a thousand yard rusher this week?
    OSU’s defense is averaging 2.1 interceptions a game. How many interceptions does it make this week?

sportsMonkey’s Predictions:
Final Score: OSU 31, Illinois 6
Illinois rushing yards: under, 50
Pittman’s rushing: over, 125 (gets his 1000)
INTs: under, 2

Zeke’s Predictions:
Final Score: OSU 40, Illinois 3
Illinois rushing yards: under, 76
Pittman’s rushing: over, 112 (gets his 1000, I agree)
INTs: over, 3

Sylvester Yon-Rambo’s Predictions:
Final Score: OSU 56, Illinois 3
Illinois rushing yards: under, 83
Pittman’s rushing: over, 138 and 2 TDs
INTs: over, 4 INTs
I stand by my theory that we will hit 50 points in a game this year eventually. (I still hope it is the Michigan game though). Illinois has no rushing game to talk of. Pittman is way down from his numbers thru 9 games from last year. I see him having a huge game on a small number of carries. The Defense comes up big with 4 JUICY interceptions and takes at least 1 back for a pick six.

Gamecock fans crow after SEC
issues cock block

FootballCouldn’t resist writing the headline.

Link.

No Love for Big East?

FootballThat intermittent cacaphony of clicks you’ll hear tonight is the collective sound of millions of remote control buttons being pushed as the eastern US switches back and forth from My Name is Earl and the Office to the Thursday night ESPN game.

Like it or not, the winner of tonight’s game controls its own destiny, and (if still undefeated) will meet the winner of the OSU/UM game OSU in Glendale.

The knee jerk reaction of most fans is to complain about the Big East’s strength of schedule, and compare it to the SEC’s, for instance. It doesn’t seem fair to most that an undefeated Big East team would get a title shot ahead of a one-loss SEC team.

To counter that, others argue that just because a conference has a lot of parity, doesn’t mean that it’s the “best” or the “strongest.” The Mountain West conference has a lot of parity, as does the Sun Belt. Doesn’t make them superior. Just because Arkansas, Tennesee, Florida, LSU, and Auburn are going to beat themselves senseless this year doesn’t make the SEC the “best” conference.

Having said that, I think most reasonable people think a Tennessee or Florida would crush WVU or Louisville in a match up. However, most reasonable people thought Georgia was going to crush WVU in the Sugar Bowl earlier this year… but it didn’t happen, even though GA had the homefield advantage.

So, what say you? Who would you prefer to have the opportunity to play against lose to OSU in Glendale this January? Most likely victims candidates include West Va., Louisville, Florida, and Auburn. Give us your opinion in the comments.

Note: I know that some will point out that UM and Texas are also possibilities, but IMO would be a slap in the face of college football. Texas had their shot, as will UM. I’m not a fan of the rematch. If you don’t like the results the first time, you shouldn’t get a “do-over.” The only occasion in which I would support a do-over type of rematch is if some external factor affected the first ballgame’s outcome, like a major officiating screwup (a’la Oregon and Oklahoma earlier this year).

Blogpoll Ballot, Week #10

Rank Team Delta
1 Ohio State
2 Michigan
3 West Virginia
4 Texas 1
5 Louisville 1
6 California 3
7 Auburn
8 Tennessee 2
9 Arkansas 3
10 Florida 1
11 Boise State 2
12 Wisconsin 4
13 Rutgers 1
14 Southern Cal 10
15 Notre Dame
16 LSU 1
17 Boston College 1
18 Texas A&M 1
19 Wake Forest 2
20 Clemson 12
21 Oklahoma 2
22 Georgia Tech 2
23 Oregon 3
24 Brigham Young 1
25 Tulsa 1

Dropped Out: Nebraska (#20), Missouri (#22).

Not a lot to say this week. Big upset for USC and disappointed let-down by Clemson account for their drastic drops. Other than that, just a little reshuffling. I have to give props to SYR for ranking Tulsa high enough to get into this week’s ballot. I hadn’t been paying attention to them, but they’re quietly sitting at 7-1. Definitely not world beaters, but good enough for him to include them in his poll.