First off, there is probably going to be a Poll Dancing post this week, but quite honestly, I haven’t had the time to get around to it. Â But there is something I’d like to throw out for your input. Â Today on Yahoo!, Dan Wetzel has a piece about what to do with the college postseason. Â As we know, he favors a playoff but he offers something of an olive branch to the BCS stalwarts: an overhaul of the BCS ranking system. Â Of the two ideas he suggests, I am most intrigued by the first: an open, objective computer-based system for comparing teams. Â I had already started working on something like he proposes to feature here in the coming weeks, so why not take it to the next level?
That’s where you come in. Â I’ve already started tweaking some initial ideas, but I’d like to know what you feel are the most important factors in determining a team’s success. Â For example, I have already included third-down conversion/opponent third-down conversion, turnover margin, and points for and against. Â I decided to filter these stats to include only games against FBS teams with a winning record, so blowouts of weak opponents will be ignored.
What else do you think makes a good team good? Â Anything at all, even it isn’t statistical in nature, is welcome. Â If there’s a way to quantify something, I’ll do my best to find it.