| Statistically Speaking |
| Ohio State |
Value (Rank) |
Value (Rank) |
Wisconsin
|
Advantage |
| Rushing Offense (ypg) |
217.3 (20) |
108.2 (22) |
Rushing Defense (ypg) |
Push |
| Passing Offense (ypg) |
248.5 (37) |
200.2 (54) |
Passing Defense (ypg) |
Push |
| Pass Efficiency |
165.7 (10) |
135.1 (83) |
Pass Efficiency Defense |
Ohio State+
|
| Total Offense (ypg) |
465.8 (18) |
308.3 (23) |
Total Defense (ypg) |
Push |
| Scoring Offense (ppg) |
43.2 (6) |
19.0 (32) |
Scoring Defense (ppg) |
Ohio State
|
| Rushing Defense (ypg) |
78.0 (4) |
240.8 (11) |
Rushing Offense (ypg) |
Push
|
| Passing Defense (ypg) |
158.3 (13) |
209.3 (67) |
Passing Offense (ypg) |
Ohio State+ |
| Pass Efficiency Defense |
93.8 (3) |
160.1 (16) |
Pass Efficiency Offense |
Push |
| Total Defense (ypg) |
236.3 (3) |
450.2 (24) |
Total Offense (ypg) |
Push
|
| Scoring Defense (ppg) |
13.5 (6) |
37.2 (15) |
Scoring Offense (ppg) |
Push |
| Turnover margin |
1.67 (3) |
0.33 (39) |
Turnover margin |
Ohio State |
| Penalty Yards/game |
41.3 (21) |
30.8 (3) |
Penalty Yards/game |
Push |
| Sacks (/game) |
1.33 (92) |
0.83 (18) |
Sacks Allowed (/game) |
Wisconsin+ |
| Sacks Allowed (/game) |
2.17 (70) |
2.00 (57) |
Sacks (/game) |
Push
|
| 3rd Down Conv. (%) |
40.7 (53) |
31.7 (17) |
3rd Down Conv. Def (%) |
Wisconsin |
| 3rd Down Conv. Def (%) |
30.0 (12) |
52.2 (10) |
3rd Down Conv. (%) |
Push
|
| Redzone Offense (%) |
91.4 (12) |
86.7 (87) |
Redzone Defense (%) |
Ohio State++
|
| Redzone Defense (%) |
75.0 (32) |
87.9 (30) |
Redzone Offense (%) |
Push
|
Legend
Difference <25 in National Rank = Push
Difference >25 in National Rank = Ohio State
Difference >50 in National Rank = Ohio State+
Difference >75 in National Rank = Ohio State++
Differences >100 in National Rank = Ohio State+++ |
|
|
Presented with one comment. That sack statistic (1.33 sacks per game) bothers me, but Vico looked at “Where Have All the Sacks Gone?” and that made me feel a little better about it. A little
As always, stats are grabbed from cfbstats.com.
el Kaiser - 
Loading ...
3 Responses to “Wisconsin by the Numbers”
I don’t know if I’ve said it before, but I love these posts. I don’t really know why.
By Bacon Ninja on Oct 14, 2010
I would say it’s normally because of all the Ohio States in the advantage column, but this week’s is a little more balanced than normal.
By el Kaiser on Oct 14, 2010
Hence the 4 pt spread. But, yeah, this is a good weekly feature.
By Ken on Oct 14, 2010